Volume XV, Number 13a
* * * DOMESTIC ISSUES * * *
May 19 - 23, 2008
"You have given a banner to those who fear You, That it may be displayed because of the truth. " (Psalm 60:4,5 NKJV)
| On Capitol Hill This Week; Vol. XV, No. 13a | |
         
         1. SENATOR KENNEDY HOSPITALIZED ON  SATURDAY;  SUFFERED THREE SEIZURES   
Sen. Edward Kennedy is undergoing further  evaluation at a Boston hospital, two days after the 76- year-old Democrat suffered a seizure. Kennedy's  spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter says it is unclear  when doctors will release information on Kennedy's  condition or on the cause of his seizure Saturday.  Cutter said Monday the senator had a restful night at  Massachusetts General Hospital. He spent Sunday  watching sports and movies and visiting with family. 
President Bush had been notified of Kennedy's health  just before he went to a Saturday night dinner meeting  with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. A White  House spokesman says Bush expressed concern for  Kennedy and said he would keep him in his prayers.  Bush has not spoken to the senator since he became  ill.
  Sen. Ted Kennedy's hospitalization Saturday drew  immediate reaction and concern from his Senate  colleagues running for president. All three candidates  described the  Democratic Massachusetts legislator as a legend of  the Senate and wished for his swift recovery. In his  remarks, for example, John McCain stated, "Senator  Kennedy's role in the U.S. Senate cannot be  overstated. He is a legendary lawmaker, and I have  the highest respect for him. When we have worked  together, he has been a skillful, fair and generous  partner. I consider it a great privilege to call him my  friend." (AP)
·  Pray for swift, clear test results to determine Sen.  Kennedy's condition.  Also pray that this attack on his  health will lead the senator to study and to follow  God's Word, very carefully. May he come to understand that to vote  for abortion and same-sex marriage is to violate God's  will. Pray that many family members will also be led to  find salvation in Jesus Christ because of this illness.   Pray that Sen. Kennedy can have the same stature  with the Lord as he now has with man.
 ·   "Bless the Lord, O my soul, and forget not all His  benefits.  Who forgiveth all thine iniquites and healeth  all thy diseases."   (Psalm 103:2,3)         
         2. CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT OVERTURNS  BAN ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE 
California Marriage Law: 4,618,673 to  Four
 After a brief period of judicial restraint, California  voters watched in horror this afternoon as judicial  activism returned with a vengeance in one of the most  egregious rulings in American jurisprudence. It took  just four activist judges to overturn the historical  definition of marriage, not to mention the vote of more  than four and a half million Californians, as the state  supreme court issued a much-anticipated ruling on  the question of same-sex "marriage." By a 4-3 margin,  the justices struck down a law, adopted by 61 percent  of voters in 2000, which defined marriage as the union  of one man and one woman. By imposing same- sex "marriage" on voters, the California Supreme  Court knowingly usurped the right of the people to  effect change in public policy.
 This outcome is even more troubling than  Massachusetts', in that California voters had already  won the right to put a marriage protection amendment  on the ballot in November. If the court cared at all  about the democratic process, it would have stayed its  decision until the people's voice was heard on the  November amendment. Instead, these justices  trampled on the legislature and created same-sex  marriage by judicial fiat. This is nothing more than a  judicial shotgun wedding that forces a redefinition of  marriage on the people of California and potentially  the rest of the nation. We trust that the voters of  California will act in November to correct this exercise  in judicial activism and to permanently enshrine the  traditional definition of marriage in the state  constitution. Clearly, this decision highlights the need  for a federal amendment defining marriage in the U.S.  Constitution. Only then will this campaign to shatter  the family's foundation be ended once and for all.  (Family Research Council)
 · Lord, we pray for Your intervention on behalf of the  people of California who overwhelmingly voted  against same-sex marriages.  We ask that today's  ruling by state judges okaying same-sex marriages is  reversed and that the matter is kept within the  confines of the state, prevented by Your divine power  from spreading to other states.  May the people of  California and the whole USA repent for this dreadful  decision that violates Your divine purposes.  We pray  that these misguided and deceived judges either be  removed from office or renewed by the power of the  Holy Spirit.
 · "Therefore, having overlooked the times of  ignorance, God is now declaring to man that all men  everywhere should repent." (Acts 17:30)
SPECIAL NOTE: We stand in agreement with the statement released by Cindy Jacobs on the critical need to pray over this issue, in repentance. As Cindy has said, "Enough is enough!" To read all of her statement, go here.         
         3. WHITE HOUSE REACTS TO CALIFORNIA  DECISION
Yesterday, the White House issued this  statement:  "President Bush has always believed  marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a  woman. It's unfortunate  when activist judges continue to seek to redefine  marriage by court order - without regard for the will of  the people. Today's decision by the California  Supreme Court  illustrates that a federal constitutional amendment is  the best way for the people to decide what marriage  means. President Bush remains firmly committed to  protecting the sanctity of marriage."  
It is outrageous that a small majority on the California  Supreme Court just could not wait until November  when the citizens of California will undoubtedly vote to  approve the ban of homosexual "marriages" in the  state of California.  Instead these 4 judicial tyrants  substituted their perverse opinion for the will of the  citizens of California.  Indeed, the voters in California  overwhelmingly voted for traditional marriage - that  between one man and one woman - with a huge  majority of 62% several years ago.
The overwhelming majority of Americans (some 70%)  disapprove of homosexual "marriages."  Yet, these  judicial tyrants in California and Massachusetts have  substituted their dictates for the will of the citizens of  their states.  Thus far, 27 states have passed  constitutional amendments banning  homosexual "marriage" with an average approval rate  of 70%.  The voters in Florida, Arizona, and California  will likely approve similar bans on  homosexual "marriages" this November, thereby  nullifying this terrible decision yesterday in California.   (Christian Coalition of America) 
·  The Christian Coalition of America will do everything  in its power to pass a Federal Marriage Amendment in  the United States Congress-- and state constitutional  amendments in each of the 23 states which do not yet  have them -- thereby banning  homosexual "marriages" all over America.  Please  see what you can do in your state by praying for your  federal judges and for the common sense of the  voters in your state.  The power of prayer is God's  Word entering into every situation. 
·  "So  God created man in His own image, in the image of  God created He him; male and female created He  them."  (Genesis 1:27)         
         4. H.R. 5910: OUTLAWING HUMAN-ANIMAL  HYBRIDS
 A Guardian newspaper commissioned poll indicates  that more than 2/3 of the Members of Parliament  intend to support the government's controversial  Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill, which would  legalize creation of chimeras (human-animal hybrids),  allow the creation of babies for harvesting of genetic  material to help cure family members ("savior  siblings"), and remove the "need for a father" with in  vitro fertilization treatment laws (allowing lesbians to  bear children via IVF). Next week proposed  amendments will be debated. One pro-life  amendment, opposed by the government, would  lower the limit for legal abortion (from now 24 weeks  to between 12 and 22 weeks). Modern technology  makes pre-born viability possible at increasingly lower  ages. As many as 12 ministers - including three of  Cabinet rank - have indicated that they may have to  quit if ordered to back this pro-death package. Prime  Minister Gordon Brown has pushed the bill with its  radical provisions, prompting rebellion by MPs with  pro-life convictions. The British House of Commons is  expected to vote on the bill next week. 
Meanwhile, Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) has introduced  The Human-Animal Hybrid Prohibition Act (H.R. 5910)  in the U.S. House, the companion to Senator Sam  Brownback's (R-KS) bill, introduced in the U.S. Senate  last fall. Pro-lifers in the U.S. and Great Britain find  themselves up against a wall of opposition  surmountable only with the help of the Lord. (Family  Research Council; Prayer Targets)
 · May God give pro-life Members of Parliament an  unbelievable victory! May He intervene to protect  babies in the embryonic stage of life in Great Britain,  where, strangely, abortion laws are more restrictive  than in the U.S.! May Rep. Chris Smith and Sam  Brownback's bills to outlaw Chimeras gain passage  in both houses!
 · "And now we call the proud happy: yea, they that  work wickedness are set up: yea they that tempt God  are even delivered."  (Malachi 3:15)
  "He delivereth and rescueth, and He worketh  signs and wonders in heaven and in earth, who hath  delivered Daniel from the power of the lions."  (Daniel 6:27)         
         5. UPDATE: THE PLEDGE PROTECTION ACT
Christian Coalition of America and other groups have  signed a letter to be sent to Members of the United  States House of Representatives requesting that they  co-sponsor Congressman Todd Akin's "Pledge  Protection Act."  Congressman Akin's bill will protect  and secure our official and legal acknowledgement of  our national relationship with God. 
  The Akin bill will serve as a much needed "check and  balance" against a judiciary that continually attempts  to remove the words "under God" from the Pledge of  Allegiance.  Passage of the "Pledge Protection Act"  will serve as a tremendous encouragement to an  overwhelming majority of Americans who want to  preserve our American values from left-wing judges  legislating from the bench.  The decision by the 4  judicial dictators in California yesterday legalizing  homosexual "marriage" in California is just one of  many examples of judicial tyranny which cannot be  allowed to stand.  The American people will not stand  for a judicial dictatorship in America. (Christian  Coalition of America)
 · Pray that support builds quickly on Capitol Hill  towards the passage of the Pledge Protection Act.  Amen!
 · "Thy people shall volunteer freely in the day of Thy  power." (Ps. 110:3 NAS)         
         6. CONGRESS, SUPREME COURT ADDRESS  FCC RULES ON INDECENT  PROGRAMMING
  Congressman Charles "Chip" Pickering is seeking co- sponsors for his "Protecting Children from Indecent  Programming Act," H.R. 3559. U.S. Supreme Court is  to rule on whether foul-mouthed celebrities can use  the "F-word" on live television without the television  networks/stations being fined.  So far Rep. Pickering  has gained 22 sponsors. Congressman Pickering's bill will:  "(R)equire the  FCC, in enforcing its regulations concerning the  broadcast of indecent programming, to maintain a  policy that a single word or image may be considered  indecent."
  Sometime this summer, the United States Supreme  Court is expected to issue a decision on whether or  not it is indecent when foul-mouthed celebrities such  as Cher and Nicole Richie, and such as Jane Fonda  and Diane Keaton - both of whom used foul-mouthed  profanities this year - use the F-word, etc. on live  television.  The United States Congress  overwhelmingly, and unanimously in the case of the  Senate, passed the "Broadcast Decency Enforcement  Act" in 2006 which increased the penalties for the  broadcast networks and television stations from  $35,000 per violation to $350,000 per violation.   (Christian Coalition of America)
  · Pray that more co-sponsors join Rep. Pickering in  this endeavor.  Certainly, our air waves need  protection, and who are these celebrities that they  should sully the ears of everyone?  Praise the Lord for  the alertness of Congressman Pickering.  Please  cover him with the protection of the Lord, for he may  come under attack.
 ·  "Call unto Me in the  day of trouble: I will deliver thee, and thou shall glorify  Me."  (Psalm 50:15)         
         7. HOUSE GOP STRIPS WAR FUNDS FROM  BILL
 The Democrat-led House yesterday passed a war- funding bill that failed to fund the wars in Iraq and  Afghanistan. The unusual outcome occurred when  Republicans used a parliamentary maneuver to  sabotage Democrats' plans to tie the proposed  $162.5 billion for the wars to a veto-provoking 18- month pullout timetable, domestic programs and a tax  increase.
 In the aftermath of the vote, accusations of political  gamesmanship were traded across the aisle. House  Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-OH) said the  Democratic leaders designed the bill to draw a veto  from President Bush and delay the war funds.  Republicans said they were protesting the Democrats'  move to ram the bill through the chamber without  giving the minority party an opportunity to offer  amendments or a vote to send the bill back to  committee. Rep. David R. Obey (D-WI), chairman of  the Appropriations Committee, said the  Republicans "voted for a cutesy-pie gimmick" to try to  disrupt the process. Mr. Obey, voting against the war  funds, bristled at the suggestion that Democrats face  criticism for passing a meaningless appropriations  bill.
 The eviscerated House bill heads to an uncertain fate  in the Senate, where the add-ons had promised to  bog down the bill even before yesterday's  maneuvering made those measures the totality of the  legislation. The Senate, which passed out of  committee yesterday a war bill similar to the House  version but without the surtax, is scheduled to take up  the issue next week. A final bill is not expected until  next month, when the Pentagon says it will be running  out of money for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  The Democrats expected to use Republican votes to  pass the war funds, but Republicans refused to follow  the script, highlighting divisions among House  Democrats between members who are willing to fund  U.S. forces and members who want the U.S. to  withdraw immediately and don't want to fund anything  other than withdrawal. (Washington Times)
 · Please pray that wisdom prevails in this matter; we  cannot pull out now when so much has been gained.   Ask the Lord to give strategies to our leaders to deal  with the matter of the wars in the Middle East. Bind the  spirit of divisiveness; loose unity, peace and wisdom. 
· "Through Thee will we push down our  enemies: through Thy Name will we tread them under  that rise up against us."  (Psalm 44:5)         
         8. REPORT: SENATE TIES  IRAQ WAR SPENDING  BILL TO AMNESTY PROVISIONS
A supplemental appropriations bill intended to provide  funding for the war effort in Iraq is being used to  promote amnesty for illegal aliens and more low- wage guest workers for powerful business interests. The addition  of two amendments to the Iraq War Supplemental  Appropriations bill will mean that in order to provide emergency funding for our troops in Iraq,  senators will be forced to approve an illegal alien  amnesty and expand guest worker programs that harm American workers.
 The Senate Appropriations Committee last included  an amendment offered by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D- Calif.) that would grant a five-year amnesty to 1.35 million illegal aliens working in agriculture, plus  their spouses and children, and allow agribusiness to  freeze wages for new guest workers at 2007 levels for the next three years. The five-year  amnesty would likely be a prelude to permanent  legalization for these illegal aliens.
 A second amendment adopted by the committee,  sponsored by Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), would  vastly increase the number of unskilled H-2B guest workers permitted to work in this country. The Mikulski  amendment would reinstate the exemption for  returning H-2B workers from numerical caps on the  program.
 Charged Dan Stein, president of the Federation for  American Immigration Reform (FAIR). "Tying amnesty  for illegal aliens and still more cheap labor for  powerful business interests to support for our troops  in Iraq is an unconscionable abuse of the  appropriations process." The American public has  repeatedly rejected the idea of granting amnesty to  illegal aliens and has adamantly opposed increases  in guest worker programs that undermine American  workers - especially in difficult economic times. Stein added, "But to choose this particular bill - the  one that pays to maintain our military personnel who  are fighting overseas - demonstrates the lengths that  this Congress will go to satisfy the demands of big  money interests."
 FAIR is calling upon the full Senate to strip these two  amendments from the bill before putting it to a  vote. "The U.S. economy has been shedding jobs at  an alarming rate over the past several months. There  is no justification whatsoever for this sort of massive  amnesty and increase in foreign guest workers,"  concluded Stein.   (www.prnewswire.com)
  ·  The Senate is just as capable as the House at  adding amendments to the military funds for the the  Middle East wars. Seriously consider contacting your  senators and representatives if you want a bill free  from any amendments to fund our military endeavors.   Praise the Lord for those senators and congressmen  who are alert to the meaning of unwaranted  amendments.  Pray! Pray! 
·  "Shall the   throne of inquity have fellowship with thee, which  frameth mischief by law?"  (Psalm 94:20)         
         9. CONGRESS TO SAUDIS: GIVE US OIL OR NO  GUNS
A group of Democratic senators wants to make a  massive arms sale to Saudi Arabia contingent on  getting cheaper oil, reports AFP. "We are saying to the  Saudis that, if you don't help us, why should we be  helping you?" says Chuck Schumer (D-NY). "We are  saying that we need real relief, and we need it quickly.  You need our arms, but we need you to cooperate and  not strangle American consumers."
At issue is an arms package worth some $20 billion.  The group has introduced a resolution in the Senate  to block the pending sale. When the controversial deal  was announced last July, Noah wrote that he  was "utterly, completely flummoxed by the Bush  Administration's decision to sell $20 billion worth of  arms to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf potentates."   (blog.wired.com/defense) 
· The USA has been more than generous to Saudi  Arabia because of oil ever since 1941, when the US  began to help that country drill for its oil and sell it on  the world market.  This move by the senators may be  a very good idea, pressuring a country bloated with oil  money to consider its long time friend.  Of course, the  Saudis will be angry, because they are used to having  their way.  Pray over this matter, for there does come a  time when "enough is enough."  The Lord knows what  we need - HIM! 
·  "Righteous art Thou, O  Lord, when I plead with Thee; yet let me talk with Thee  of Thy judgemnts ; 'Wherefore doth the way of the  wicked prosper? wherefore are all they happy that  deal very treacherously?"  (Jeremiah 12:1)         
         10. SAUDIS INCREASE OIL  PRODUCTION
Saudi Arabia granted  President Bush's request for an increase in oil  production early Saturday, while the Bush  administration heeded calls from Congress to  temporarily stop filling the Strategic Petroleum  Reserve. Mr. Bush's latest round of "oil diplomacy"  proved more fruitful than a trip in January, during  which Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest producer and  a U.S. ally, flatly rejected his pleas for increased  output. Yesterday, the Saudis used the occasion of his  visit to announce a 300,000 barrel-per-day increase in  production, mostly for U.S. customers. "The president  has asked the Saudis to produce oil to meet  demand," Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman,  told reporters in Riyadh. "He was reassured by the  king that they have increased production as the  market demands." But the move to suspend  shipments of premium crude oil to the strategic  reserve was a reversal of longstanding administration  policy and a bow to Congress, where Republicans  overwhelmingly sided with Democrats against adding  to the reserve while oil prices are soaring to  unprecedented levels. (Washington Times)
 · On Friday evening, when we published that edition of  the Daily Brief, the news out of Saudi Arabia was that  the Saudis had refused to make any change in the  price of oil. Well . . . something must have changed overnight,  because today we have this good news to report. We  wonder what happened? Could it be that, once again,  God's people cried out for mercy, and He answered? Praise Him!
· "The effectual, fervent prayer of a righteous man  availeth much." (James 5:16)         
| Publishing Notice | |
         
 Publishing Notice          
This alert will not be published next weekend, in honor of the Memorial Day holiday. Congress will also go into recess on Friday evening, resuming its business on Monday evening, June 2.
The next edition of "On Capitol Hill This Week" will be published on Monday, June 2.
| This Week, Worship Our Lord As . . . | |
        
This Week, Worship Our Lord As . . .
 TRUE GOD (Eh-lo-heem Eh-met) 
  "But the LORD is the true God; He is the living  God, the eternal King. (Jer. 10:10)         
Thank You that You revealed Yourself to me -- the True God. I desire no other gods, but You, the True God. As all men search for truth, how thankful I am to know You.
(Taken from: Intimate Moments with the Hebrew Names of God, by Barri Cae Malin and Shmuel Wolkenfeld; Bridge-Logos Publishers; Gainesville, FL, 32614. ISBN: 0-88270-801-5)
 
